
Calvin and Hobbes by Bill Watterson - January 25, 1993
I've had enough of this.  Even if dictionaries such as Merriam-Webster have conceded defeat, I stand my ground:  "access" is not a verb.  Neither is "leverage."
"Access" is a noun.  It's a thing.  "Do you have access to the bear pit?"
Soul-sucking: Let me access that file.
Better:               Let me get/find/fetch/look up/obtain that file.
"Leverage," too, is a noun.  The suffix 
-age is a good indication of this.  Leverage is the the term for the mechanical advantage gained by using a lever, such as Archimedes proposed to apply to the earth if given a place to stand.  The verb referring to the use of a lever to pry or otherwise apply a force is, perhaps confusingly, also "lever."
Soul-sucking: We should leverage this new technology in building our robot army.
Better:               We should exploit/take advantage of/apply this new technology in building our robot army.
Before anyone calls me out on this, yes, I enjoy verbing words when speaking or writing informally - but I do this only when I know my audience will understand and find it amusing.  This isn't about English snobbery - it's about speaking precisely and making oneself clearly understood.
Also, programmers take note:  the opposite of "stateless" (as in "HTTP is a stateless protocol") is not "stateful."  "Stateful" is a adjective describing, for example, an event replete with pomp: "The representative of the Crab People was greeted with a stateful reception."  The opposite of "stateless" is 
persistent.  That is, the state of the transaction 
persists between sessions.
Soul-sucking: HTTP is a stateless protocol.  My proposed method is stateful.*
Better:               HTTP is a stateless protocol.  My proposed method is persistent.
* This, however,  
would be acceptable if your proposed method were full of pomp and vainglory.
More on the death of language to come.